Evaluation of Instructional Design Plan for Instructional Module (50 pts)
RUBRIC
FOR ID PLAN |
||||
Unacceptable |
Developing |
Competent |
Exemplary |
|
Executive
Summary (5 points) |
No executive summary is included. (0 points) |
Explanation of module and is somewhat unclear and the overview of the instructional design plan is incomplete. (1-2 points) |
Explains the module and gives a general overview of what is included in the instructional design plan. It is mostly free of technical jargon. (3-4 points) |
Clearly explains the module and gives a concise yet complete overview of what is included in the instructional design plan. It is easy to understand and free of technical jargon (any jargon used is explained). (5 points) |
Format (5 points) |
The layout and formatting of the plan make it difficult to follow and navigate. It is not professional in appearance. (0 points) |
The layout and formatting of the plan make it somewhat difficult to follow and navigate. (1-2 points) |
The plan is cleanly laid out and formatted. It is somewhat easy to follow and navigate. (3-4 points) |
The plan is well-designed and well-formatted. It is easy to follow and navigate. It is professional in appearance and content. (5 points) |
Topic and Problem Statement (5 points) |
The instructional problem is not defined. (0 points) |
The instructional problem is unclear and/or it is unclear how the instructional module will address that problem. (1-2 points) |
Identifies the instructional problem and communicates the purpose of the instructional module. (3-4 points) |
Clearly and concisely identifies the instructional problem, making the need for instruction evident. It is clear what purpose the instructional module will serve. (5 points) |
Goals (5 points) |
The instructional goal(s) have not been identified. (0 points) |
The instructional goal(s) are unclearly stated and/or it is not clear how they are related to the instructional problem. (1-2 points) |
The overall instrucational goal(s) are identified and are related to the instructional problem. They are broadly stated and provide a general focus for the instruction. (3-4 points) |
The overall instrucational goal(s) are clearly and concisely stated, and logically follow from the instructional problem. They are broadly stated and provide a general focus for the instruction. (5 points) |
Learner Analysis (5 points) |
Target audience is not identified. (0 points) |
Identification of target audience lacks clarity and specificity, and leaves out relevant learner characteristics. (1-2 points) |
Identifies the target audience and identifies relevant characteristics. (3-4 points) |
Clearly identifies the target audience, identifying all relevant characteristics including prerequisite or assumed knowledge. (5 points) |
Instructional Objectives/Tasks (5 points) |
Objectives are not identified or are missing. (0 points) |
Objectives are poorly written or much of the necessary information is missing (3 or the 4 criteria are not clear). (1-2 points) |
Objectives are fairly clear and most of the necessary information is included (1 or the 4 criteria may not be clear). (3-4 points) |
Objectives are concise, clear and complete, and are written using the ABCD format. (5 points) |
Instructional Strategies (Demonstration, Application, Integration) (5 points) |
The instructional strategies are missing. (0 points) |
The instructional strategies are difficult to follow and do not fit with the given objective(s) and task(s). (1-2 points) |
The instructional strategies are adequate and appropriate for the given objective(s) and task(s). (3-4 points) |
The instructional strategies are logical, clearly written and tied to the given objective(s) and task(s). (5 points) |
Course Map / Instructional Sequence (5 points) |
The course map/instructional sequence is missing. It is unclear how learners will progress through the module. (0 points) |
The sequence of instruction is somewhat unclear. It is unclear how the learners progress through at least some parts of the module. (1-2 points) |
The sequence of instruction is identified. It is clear how the learners progress through the module. (3-4 points) |
The sequence of instruction is clearly and creatively expressed. It is clear exactly how the learners progress through the module. (5 points) |
Assessment Plan (5 points) |
Method of assessment is missing. (0 points) |
Assessment plan is not adequate and does not make sense for the type of lesson. (1-2 points) |
Assessment plan is adequate but may not be the most appropriate for the intended instruction. (3-4 points) |
Assessment plan is clearly identified and strongly tied to the objectives and purpose for instruction. (5 points) |
Instructional Alignment (5 points) |
There is little or no alignment between the instructional objectives, learning activities, and assessment. The lesson is not well-designed. (0 points) |
There is limited alignment between the instructional objectives, learning activities, and assessment. The lesson is disjointed and does not flow well together. (1-2 points) |
There is mainly alignment between the instructional objectives, learning activities, and assessment. (3-4 points) |
There is strong and evident alignment between the instructional objectives, learning activities, and assessment. The lesson is cohesive and well-designed. (5 points) |