ID Theory Evaluation Rubric

ID Theory and Practice Project Rubric (50 Points)

	Unacceptable	Developing	Competent	Exemplary
APA Citations - 5 points Describes the use of APA 6th editition citations and style	Did not submit citations	The citations contain numerous errors according to APA style.	The citations are in APA style with one or two minor errors (e.g., missing period or comma).	The citations are given in proper APA style with no errors.
Theory or Model Summary - 10 points Describes how well the student has summarized the chosen theory or model in the wiki	Did not submit to the wiki	A minimal posting was made to the wiki. A weak or incomplete summary of the theory or model chosen was provided.	The posting in the wiki provided a reasonable amount of information, but may be missing key points or details related to basic tenets, notable publications, or theorists. A graphical representation may be appropriate but is not provided.	The posting in the wiki provided a good deal of well-cited information related to basic tenets, notable publications, and theorists related to the chosen theory/model. A graphical representation, if appropriate to the model in question, was provided.
Example Application - 10 points Describes how well the student has applied an example scenario to the chosen theory or model in the wiki	Did not submit to the wiki	An example application of the chosen theory or model was provided, but was weak or incomplete. The example may not have been an appropriate one for the model/theory chosen.	The example of application of the chosen theory or model is appropriate and mostly complete, although it may be missing key details to fully show the relationship between theory and practice.	The example of application of the chosen theory or model is appropriate and complete, providing a good amount of key details to fully show the relationship between theory and practice.
Presentation Content - 10 points Describes the overall quality of the presentation contributions of each team member individually	Presentation is not complete and/or poorly executed.	The individual student's section of the presentation is somewhat complete, although may be missing important details or insights drawn from the wiki participation.	The individual student's section of the presentation is mostly complete, although may be cursory in its discussion of insights drawn from the wiki participation.	The individual student's section of the presentation is complete and thorough in presenting the topics and insights drawn by each team member during the wiki project.
Presentation Design and Delivery - 7 points Describes the overall quality of the presentation (All students receive the same score)	Presentation is not complete and/or poorly executed. Evidence of teamwork is not visible and guidelines provided for the presentation have not been followed.	Presentation is somewhat complete, although many guidelines were not followed, and most members of the group may not have had equal time to present. One or two students may have "dominated" the presentation or discussion.	Presentation is mostly complete, although some guidelines were not followed, and some members of the group may not have had equal time to present.	Presentation is thorough and complete, and all members of the class received equal time in presenting their thoughts and ideas to the group.
Collaboration and Teamwork - 8 Points Describes the overall level of collaboration and teamwork evident (All students receive the same score)	Collaboration, teamwork, and equal distribution of effort is not evident.	Some collaboration and teamwork is evident. Some students may not have contributed equally to all design, planning, and presentation activities.	Collaboration and teamwork is mostly evident. Students appear to have contributed equally or mostly equally to design, planning, and presentation activities.	Full collaboration and teamwork is evident. All students contributed equally to design, planning, and presentation activities.